Hitachi EH-CPU208 vs Mitsubishi FX3U-32MT/ES PLC Comparison
Page Info
Mason (Technical Writer)5 Views 25-12-17 Product-Insights
Main Content
Hitachi EH-CPU208 vs Mitsubishi FX3U-32MT/ES PLC Comparison
1. Introduction to Core Logic Selection in Industrial Control
Selecting the appropriate Central Processing Unit (CPU) or main controller for a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) system is the most critical decision in industrial automation design. The choice between a modular system like the HITACHI EH-150 series, featuring the EH-CPU208, and a compact, all-in-one unit like the MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES, profoundly impacts system scalability, maintenance overhead, and application flexibility. This comparison guide is structured around the practical considerations and operational experiences of control engineers who must balance initial cost against long-term operational efficiency and system expansion capability. We will analyze how the structural differences, processing capabilities, and field support mechanisms of these two controllers influence deployment strategies and maintenance protocols in real-world settings.
2. Initial System Architecture: Modular Flexibility vs. Integrated Simplicity
The first point of divergence in choosing a controller involves architecture: whether to opt for a modular rack-based system or a compact, fixed-I/O unit. This choice dictates the physical footprint, the initial configuration process, and the ability to adapt to future requirements.
2.1. The Modular Approach: HITACHI EH-CPU208 (EH-150 Series)
The EH-CPU208 serves as the brain for the HITACHI EH-150 series, which employs a modular, backplane-based architecture. This means the CPU is a standalone module that plugs into a rack alongside power supply and I/O modules.
When a designer opts for the EH-CPU208, the immediate benefit is flexible sizing. The system is built module by module, allowing an engineer to precisely match the required I/O count, special function modules (e.g., analog, high-speed counter), and communication units to the application needs. This structure is often preferred when:
- The total I/O count is expected to be high (e.g., 256 points or more).
- The system requires a diverse range of special function modules (e.g., proprietary communication interfaces, dedicated motion control).
- Future expansion is a certainty, as adding capacity merely involves plugging in another I/O module into a vacant slot or linking to an expansion rack.
However, the initial setup involves selecting and purchasing multiple components (power supply, backplane, CPU, I/O cards), which can translate to a higher upfront cost and a more complex initial wiring process than an integrated unit.
2.2. The All-in-One Approach: MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES (MELSEC-F Series)
The FX3U-32MT/ES is a compact main unit that integrates the CPU, power supply, and fixed I/O points (16 inputs, 16 outputs) into a single enclosure. This architecture is the epitome of simplicity and efficiency for small-scale to mid-scale applications.
An engineer choosing the FX3U-32MT/ES prioritizes fast deployment and minimal wiring complexity. Because the power and I/O terminations are built directly into the main unit, installation time is significantly reduced. This unit excels in scenarios where:
- The I/O requirements are well-defined and stable (around 32 points initially).
- Space is highly constrained within the control panel.
- The project demands the lowest possible initial component cost and configuration time.
While the FX3U series offers robust expansion capabilities via specialized adapter boards and expansion modules, the fixed I/O count of the main unit limits the immediate flexibility, often requiring external expansion units sooner if the I/O count increases unexpectedly beyond 32 points.
3. Critical Performance Metrics for Cycle Time and Throughput
For applications involving high-speed machinery, precise timing, or heavy data processing, the raw performance metrics of the controller's CPU are paramount. Performance is typically measured by instruction execution time and program memory capacity.
3.1. CPU Speed and Instruction Processing
The speed at which a PLC executes its instruction set directly affects the loop time (scan time) of the control system. A faster scan time allows the system to react more quickly to sensor inputs, which is vital for quality control and safety functions.
| Feature | HITACHI EH-CPU208 (EH-150 Series) | MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES (MELSEC-F Series) | User Experience Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Instruction Speed | Approximately 1.0 µs per command | Approximately 65 ns per step (LD instruction) | FX3U-32MT/ES offers a significantly faster basic instruction processing time, making it generally superior for applications requiring extremely tight control loops, such as simple packaging machines or pick-and-place robots. |
| Program Capacity | 7.6k steps | 64 k steps | FX3U-32MT/ES provides twice the maximum program memory, offering greater headroom for complex algorithms, data logging routines, or extensive diagnostic code. |
| Max. I/O Points | Up to 512 points (EH-CPU208A: Expansionable stages = 0) | Up to 384 points (max total I/O) | The EH-CPU208 platform is built to handle larger I/O counts, giving it the edge in managing extensive automation networks such as large conveyor systems or multi-zone temperature control. |
| Data Registers | Varies, typically robust for mid-range | 32,000 internal relays (auxiliary), 32,000 data registers (D) | Both are suitable, but the large, pre-defined memory map of the FX3U simplifies data handling for engineers familiar with the MELSEC platform. |
3.2. The Impact of Processing Power on Control Strategy
When an engineer is faced with selecting one of these controllers for a new machine design, the choice often comes down to the required computational workload:
- Choose the MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES if the primary concern is extremely fast, deterministic I/O scanning for a relatively small number of I/O points, or if the control program involves complex arithmetic or data manipulation that benefits from the faster instruction cycle.
- Choose the HITACHI EH-CPU208 if the system requires managing a vast, distributed network of I/O, where the ability to handle a larger number of expansion modules and the overall system throughput (measured over multiple tasks) is more critical than the sheer speed of a single basic instruction. The EH-150 series’ modular design provides a more robust backplane for handling data from a high volume of specialized modules simultaneously.
4. Communication and Networking Capabilities
Modern automation requires controllers to be deeply integrated into the manufacturing execution system (MES) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) layers. Communication protocols and port availability are key differentiators.
Both controllers provide the necessary interfaces for basic machine-to-HMI (Human-Machine Interface) communication, but their approach to higher-level networking differs due to their fundamental architectures.
4.1. MITSUBISHI FX3U Communication Flexibility
The FX3U-32MT/ES typically comes standard with an RS-422/RS-485 port for programming and standard serial communication. However, its strength lies in the extensive use of plug-in communication boards and specialized network modules. An engineer can easily add Ethernet (for standard TCP/IP-based communication) , CC-Link, or Modbus communication by installing a small adapter board directly onto the main unit.
Engineer’s Decision Flow: If the application requires connectivity to standard industrial networks (Ethernet/IP, PROFINET, CC-Link) but is constrained by panel space, the FX3U’s method of adding communication through compact expansion modules (e.g., FX3U-ENET-P502 / FX3U-ENET / FX3U-ENET-ADP, depending on configuration) offers the most efficient use of space and cost.
4.2. HITACHI EH-CPU208 Communication Framework
The EH-CPU208 utilizes its modular design to accommodate communications. It features two built-in RS-232 ports for direct device connection and programming. For industrial protocols like Modbus TCP/IP, PROFIBUS-DP, or DeviceNet, the system requires dedicated communication modules that occupy slots on the main backplane or expansion rack.
Engineer’s Decision Flow: If the application requires multiple, diverse network protocols operating simultaneously (e.g., one port for a barcode scanner, another for a remote I/O link, and a third for MES data collection), the modular EH-150 platform, with its ability to host several large communication modules, provides a more segregated and high-throughput solution.
5. Real-World Deployment Scenario
Consider a scenario involving two distinct applications:
5.1. Scenario 1: High-Speed Sorting Conveyor (FX3U-32MT/ES)
- Application: A small logistics hub needs a system to control a sorting conveyor with 30 pneumatic diverters and 2 high-speed encoders. The control logic is simple, focusing on quick decision-making based on barcode scans.
- Controller Selection: MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES is the preferred choice.
- Why: The total I/O is exactly 32 points, which the main unit covers perfectly, eliminating the need for any additional I/O cards. The most critical requirement is the need for ultra-fast response time (sub-millisecond) to accurately track parts using the encoders and actuate the diverters. The FX3U's 65 ns instruction speed and built-in high-speed counting inputs provide the necessary performance with minimal system complexity. The small form factor allows the control panel to be mounted directly on the conveyor frame.
5.2. Scenario 2: Distributed Chemical Dosing System (EH-CPU208)
- Application: A batch chemical process requiring control over 12 dosing valves, 8 flow meters (analog I/O), 4 PID loops for temperature control, and 1 dedicated PROFIBUS link to a legacy analytical instrument. The I/O is distributed across two large cabinets.
- Controller Selection: HITACHI EH-CPU208 (EH-150 Series) is the preferred choice.
- Why: The application demands diverse and complex special function modules (analog input/output, dedicated temperature control modules) that are best housed in a modular rack. The total I/O count, including the complex analog and temperature loops, significantly exceeds 100 points, which is easily managed by the EH-150's higher I/O capacity. The modular structure allows the engineer to place the CPU and communication modules in the main cabinet and use a remote I/O module (connected via a specialized link card) to manage I/O in the secondary cabinet, optimizing wiring runs and reducing installation time for the entire distributed system.
6. Installation and Maintenance Notes
The long-term cost of ownership is heavily influenced by the ease of installation, troubleshooting, and replacement procedures. Engineers prioritize systems that offer quick diagnostics and minimal downtime during component failure.
6.1. Power Supply and Module Replacement Strategy
| Maintenance Aspect | HITACHI EH-CPU208 (Modular) | MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES (Integrated) | Field Experience Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Supply Failure | Power supply is a separate module (e.g., EH-PS101/201). If it fails, only the Power Supply module needs replacement. The CPU remains in the rack. | Power supply is integrated into the main unit. If the power section fails, the entire FX3U-32MT/ES unit must be replaced. | EH-150 offers better component-level maintainability, potentially lower replacement cost for a PSU failure, and less complex wiring disruption. |
| CPU Module Failure | Hot-swapping is often supported (check specific models). Replacement involves unclipping the CPU module and sliding a new one into the backplane slot. | Entire unit replacement required. All I/O wiring must be disconnected and reconnected to the terminal block of the new unit. | FX3U replacement is simple for the component but disruptive to the I/O wiring, potentially increasing the risk of wiring errors during a critical shutdown. |
| Firmware Updates | Typically updated via programming software (Pro-H) through the dedicated programming port. The process is isolated to the CPU module. | Also updated via the programming port (GX Works). Often requires a clean slate approach, ensuring all parameters and programs are backed up. | Both systems have reliable update procedures, but the EH-CPU208 benefits from the clear demarcation of the CPU function from the I/O interface. |
| Diagnostics and LEDs | Status LEDs (Power, Run, Error) are highly visible on the front of the individual CPU module. | Status LEDs are also on the front, with dedicated LEDs for specific I/O points for immediate visual fault tracing. | The FX3U’s integrated I/O LEDs offer faster, localized troubleshooting for I/O issues without needing to refer to separate I/O cards. |
6.2. Program Backup and Restoration
EH-CPU208: The program and data are typically stored in the module's memory, often backed up by a battery. Upon replacement, the new module must be loaded with the existing program from the maintenance laptop or backup media. The use of a memory cassette for program transfer is a common, reliable maintenance practice.
FX3U-32MT/ES: Programs are stored internally, with battery backup for volatile memory. Many technicians prefer using the internal memory cassette feature (optional FX3U-FLROM-64) for instantaneous transfer of the program to the new unit upon replacement. This can drastically reduce the downtime compared to connecting a laptop and performing a lengthy download process in the field.
Engineering Judgment: If the priority is minimizing system-wide downtime during a total controller failure, and the technicians are well-trained on I/O rewiring, the MITSUBISHI FX3U's simplicity and optional memory cassette make for a very fast replacement process. If, however, the system is large and complex, where I/O rewiring is risky and time-consuming, the HITACHI EH-CPU208’s modularity ensures that a CPU swap does not affect the existing I/O wiring.
7. Scalability and Future-Proofing
While initial requirements drive the purchase, a forward-looking engineer must consider how easily the system can adapt to unforeseen changes or expansions over a machine's 10-15 year lifespan.
7.1. I/O and Module Expansion Headroom
- EH-CPU208: As part of the EH-150 series, the platform is inherently designed for modular scalability. For EH-CPU208A, expansion racks are not supported (Expansionable stages = 0); maximum I/O is 512 points (using 64-point modules). The investment is in the rack and backplane, which provides a stable foundation for future growth. If the process suddenly requires 6 new analog outputs, the engineer simply adds an analog output card to an empty slot.
- FX3U-32MT/ES: While integrated, the FX3U series offers highly capable expansion. It supports dedicated expansion options including communication expansion boards (e.g., FX3U-485-BD for RS-485 communication) and specialized extension cables to link additional FX series modules. However, the fundamental structure remains limited by the integrated CPU/PSU. Exceeding the high-speed I/O or special function limits may necessitate a complete platform upgrade to the MELSEC-L or iQ-R series, a potentially costly migration.
Conditional Recommendation: For projects where the maximum required I/O is genuinely unknown, or where high-count analog and temperature control are highly likely to be added later, the HITACHI EH-CPU208 (EH-150) provides a more robust and flexible path for expansion without necessitating a platform change.
7.2. Programming Environment and Software Interoperability
The longevity of a PLC system also depends on the availability and robustness of its programming environment.
- HITACHI EH-CPU208: Uses the Pro-H software. This environment is stable and provides all necessary tools for programming, simulation, and diagnostics. However, its user base is geographically specialized, and finding local, niche expertise may sometimes be challenging compared to globally dominant platforms.
- MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES: Utilizes GX Works2 (or GX Developer). This is a highly mature, widely adopted global platform. Advantage for the Engineer: A global install base means it is significantly easier to find experienced technicians, sample code, and specialized third-party support (e.g., driver development, HMI integration tools), reducing the long-term support burden.
If the decision hinges on global interoperability and ease of recruiting maintenance personnel, the MITSUBISHI platform offers a distinct advantage due to its widespread adoption.
8. Motion Control Integration: Dedicated vs. Embedded Capabilities
In modern machine design, the line between general control and dedicated motion control is often blurred. The approach each controller takes to integrated motion can be a decisive factor.
8.1. HITACHI EH-CPU208: Dedicated Motion Modules
The EH-150 series typically relies on dedicated, high-performance motion control modules (e.g., pulse-train output or network-based motion cards) that plug into the backplane. This approach offloads the intense real-time calculations required for multi-axis coordinated motion from the main CPU.
User Benefit: By using dedicated modules, the user is ensured of highly deterministic, jitter-free motion control, regardless of the complexity or scan time of the main control program. This is the preferred method when precision and coordinated motion (e.g., three-axis interpolation for a high-speed gantry) are non-negotiable requirements. The main EH-CPU208 focuses solely on sequence and process control.
8.2. MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES: Integrated Pulse Outputs
The FX3U-32MT/ES, particularly the MT (Transistor Output) model, features integrated high-speed pulse outputs. This allows the main unit to directly control two or three independent stepper or servo drives without an expensive, dedicated motion module.
User Benefit: This integrated approach significantly reduces the component count and wiring, making it highly cost-effective for simple, point-to-point motion (e.g., indexing tables, simple feeders). The engineer can manage simple speed, position, and homing routines directly within the core ladder logic program. However, if the motion requirement escalates to complex electronic gearing or camming, the user may find the core FX3U platform lacking the necessary dedicated processing power and will need to transition to a more advanced series.
9. Environmental and Operational Resilience
The physical environment where the PLC operates often dictates its longevity and reliability. Considerations like temperature tolerance, vibration resistance, and electrical noise immunity are critical.
9.1. Temperature and Humidity Management
- FX3U-32MT/ES: The integrated design, while compact, must dissipate heat from the CPU, power supply, and I/O components within a single casing. Generally, compact PLCs are rated for standard industrial environments (e.g., 0 degrees C to 55 degrees C). Technicians note that densely packed cabinets may require active cooling when using the FX3U, particularly if multiple expansion units are attached, as thermal issues can cause intermittent errors.
- EH-CPU208: The modular structure allows heat to be distributed across multiple modules and the backplane. This structural separation can sometimes provide slightly better thermal performance in constrained environments, assuming adequate ventilation is provided within the rack area. The standard operating range is similar, but the separation of the heat-generating power supply module often leads to greater inherent stability.
9.2. Noise Immunity and Grounding
Both units are designed for industrial immunity standards. However, the modularity of the EH-150 series means that specialized noise filtering modules can be selectively placed in the rack, often enhancing protection for sensitive analog or communication modules. The FX3U's integrated nature requires more rigorous external grounding and shielding of I/O cables to achieve the same level of noise suppression, especially in environments with high electromagnetic interference (EMI) from large motors or Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs). The engineer must employ meticulous wiring practices when installing the FX3U near noise sources.
Conditional Assessment: For installations in electrically noisy environments or those with high ambient temperatures, the EH-CPU208's modularity allows for targeted mitigation strategies (e.g., shielded isolation modules), potentially offering a more stable long-term solution, provided the cabinet design is structurally sound.
10. Decisive Factors: A Comparative Summary Table
| Feature/Metric | HITACHI EH-CPU208 (EH-150 Series) | MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES (MELSEC-F Series) | Optimal Application Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Architecture | Modular, Rack/Backplane | Integrated (CPU, Power, I/O) | EH-CPU208: Large, distributed, or highly customized I/O systems. |
| Instruction Speed | Slower (approx. 1.0 µs per command) | Faster (approx. 65 ns) | FX3U-32MT/ES: Speed-critical applications (e.g., high-speed motion, inspection). |
| I/O Expansion Method | Dedicated I/O modules plugged into backplane | Specialized expansion units and adapter boards | EH-CPU208: Highly flexible and less disruptive module additions. |
| Maintenance on PSU Failure | Replace Power Supply Module Only | Replace Entire Main Unit | EH-CPU208: Lower replacement cost, less I/O rewiring. |
| Motion Control Approach | Relies on Dedicated Motion Modules | Integrated High-Speed Pulse Outputs | FX3U-32MT/ES: Cost-effective for simple, 1-2 axis positioning. |
| Environmental Resilience | Enhanced Mitigation through Modular Slotting | Requires Rigorous External Shielding/Grounding | EH-CPU208: Better for high EMI/distributed signal paths. |
| Programming Software | Pro-H | GX Works2/Developer | FX3U-32MT/ES: Easier global support, widely recognized programming environment. |
11. Final Decision Framework: Which Controller for Which Project?
The decision between the HITACHI EH-CPU208 and the MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES is fundamentally a choice between flexibility of scale and initial simplicity/speed.
11.1. Select HITACHI EH-CPU208 If:
- High-Capacity Requirement: The machine is complex, and the total I/O count is anticipated to exceed 100 points, or if the system requires a very high density of specialized modules (e.g., 4 or more analog input/output cards).
- Long-Term Scalability is Paramount: The machine design must accommodate unforeseen expansion over the next decade, and the engineer wants to avoid a complete platform migration to a larger series.
- High Availability and Maintainability are Key: Modular design allows for quick, isolated component replacement (PSU or CPU) without disrupting the I/O wiring, translating to minimal process downtime.
- Complex Motion or Harsh EMI is Present: The application requires multi-axis coordinated motion or operates in a highly noisy electrical environment, benefiting from the use of dedicated, shielded modules in a stable backplane architecture.
11.2. Select MITSUBISHI FX3U-32MT/ES If:
- Speed is the Primary Constraint: The application is driven by high-speed I/O response, and the faster instruction execution time of the FX3U is required to meet the necessary cycle time (e.g., less than 10 ms scan time).
- Space and Cost are Limited: The control panel must be small, and the budget dictates the lowest possible initial cost for a capable controller. The fixed I/O of the main unit is sufficient for the immediate needs.
- Widespread Technical Support is Preferred: The project will be deployed globally, and local maintenance teams are more likely to have existing knowledge and tools for the widely installed MITSUBISHI MELSEC platform.
- Simple Motion is Integrated: The system requires only basic, single-axis positioning (speed/direction control) that can be easily managed using the controller's built-in high-speed pulse outputs, maximizing cost efficiency.
In conclusion, the FX3U-32MT/ES offers an unparalleled balance of performance and size for small-to-mid applications where speed is key, while the EH-CPU208 provides the superior structural platform for large-scale, custom, and highly expandable industrial systems.
Note to Readers: This guide is based on technical specifications and common field experience for informational purposes only. Always consult the official product manuals and application guides from HITACHI and MITSUBISHI before making final control system design decisions.
The author assumes no liability for any loss, damage, or malfunction resulting from the use or application of this information. Use is strictly at the reader's own risk.
- PreviousSchneider ATV930 VFD Trip Faults: Phase Loss, Overheat, Overload 25.12.17
- NextFANUC A06B-6117-H209 Servo Alarms: 401, 403, 417, 434 25.12.13