Yokogawa YS170 to YS1700 Migration: Single-Loop Controller

---

1. The Critical Need for Single-Loop Controller Upgrades in Process Industries

Single-loop programmable controllers like the YOKOGAWA YS170 are the unsung heroes in process industries—refining, chemical, and power generation—where they directly manage critical variables like temperature, pressure, and flow. When a controller in a legacy system fails, the resulting disruption demands immediate action. The YS170, a highly reliable workhorse, was officially discontinued on January 1, 2008.

For maintenance engineers, the sudden failure of a discontinued part creates a high-stakes scenario: balancing system stability against the obsolescence of the control hardware. The YS1700 Programmable Indicating Controller from the YS1000 Series is the official, modern replacement, engineered specifically to address this urgent need for component refresh and system continuity. Understanding the direct migration path from the YS170 to the YS1700 is paramount for minimizing downtime and securing long-term operational integrity.

---

2. Evaluating Key Differences: YS170 Versus YS1700 Core Specifications

The YS1700 is a technological leap from the YS170, offering enhanced performance, functionality, and reliability, while maintaining critical physical compatibility. A simple comparison reveals where the YS1700 truly provides a superior operating platform.

Table 2.1: Critical Technical Comparison and Performance Uplift

Feature Category	YOKOGAWA YS170 (Legacy)	YOKOGAWA YS1700 (Replacement)	Experienced User Interpretation
Panel Cutout Dimension	Panel cutout 137 × 68 mm, front panel 144 × 72 mm	Same 137 × 68 mm panel cutout and 144 × 72 mm front panel (drop-in compatible with YS170)	This is the most crucial factor in replacement scenarios. Since the panel cutout dimensions are identical between the YS170 and YS1700, installation requires minimal panel rework, saving significant field labor time.
Control Accuracy (I/O)	Voltage Input: plus/minus 0.2 percent / Current Output: plus/minus 1.0 percent	Voltage Input: plus/minus 0.1 percent / Current Output: plus/minus 0.2 percent	Superior Control Precision: Doubling the accuracy of voltage input and vastly improving current output precision means tighter process control and reduced variability, leading to better product quality and resource efficiency.
Internal Data Resolution	1/1000 (I/O Signal) / 1/4096 (Computation)	1/10000 (I/O Signal) / 1/65536 (Computation)	Computational Power: A massive increase in internal resolution ensures extremely fine-grained PID calculations and complex control loops, essential for advanced applications like boiler combustion control.
Display Technology	Full-dot LCD display (with backlight)	Full-dot TFT LCD (color, sunlight-readable)	Compared with the YS170’s monochrome full-dot LCD, the YS1700’s full-dot color TFT LCD offers superior visibility, trend display, and bar graphs, allowing operators to assess the control state faster, especially in high-glare control rooms.
Memory Backup	NVRAM (Non-Volatile RAM)	Nonvolatile Memory (No Battery/Capacitor)	Reduced Maintenance: Eliminating the need for backup batteries or capacitors significantly lowers the maintenance burden, a key operational advantage for geographically distributed assets.
Programming Capacity	Up to 400 Steps (Text Program)	Up to 1000 Steps (Text) / 400 Modules (Function Block)	Future-Proofing: Increased capacity allows for more sophisticated, custom control schemes and the implementation of advanced functions without needing external computing units.
Fault Tolerance	Single CPU Architecture	Dual CPU (Main and Display CPUs)	High Reliability: Should the main control CPU fail, the display CPU can take over display and manual operation functions, allowing an operator to maintain control until a replacement can be installed. This is a critical safety feature.

---

3. Real-World Deployment Scenario

3.1. Chemical Reactor Temperature Control in a Pharmaceutical Plant

In pharmaceutical manufacturing, precise temperature control of a batch reactor is non-negotiable, as even small variations can ruin an entire batch. The legacy YS170 was typically used here for simple PID control of the steam valve. Its plus/minus 0.2 percent input accuracy was adequate for older standards, but its limited programming capacity often required external devices (like setpoint generators or ratio setters) to handle batch-specific ramp/soak profiles.

The deployment of the YS1700 transforms this process. Its plus/minus 0.1 percent input accuracy allows for tighter control margins. More significantly, the YS1700’s vastly increased programming capacity and use of IEEE 754 floating-point math allows the entire batch-control recipe—including complex calculated setpoint profiles, logging, and interlocks—to be handled inside the single controller.

Scenario Contrast:

• YS170 Deployment: Required the YS170 unit plus one external distributor unit and one ratio setting unit. Troubleshooting required checking three separate hardware components.
• YS1700 Deployment: Consolidates all functions into the single YS1700 via Function Block Programming. The enhanced diagnostic capabilities of the Dual CPU architecture allow for faster fault identification, minimizing high-value batch loss when a failure occurs.

---

4. Installation and Maintenance Notes

4.1. Physical Installation: Drop-in vs. Wiring Considerations

While the YS1700 maintains the essential 96 x 96 mm panel cutout of the YS170, ensuring a simple "drop-in" fit into the existing control panel, a professional installer should be aware of key differences at the terminal block level:

• Wiring Density: The YS1700, especially the expandable I/O type, offers more I/O flexibility. Field technicians should verify the specific terminal assignments against the new YS1700 General Specification sheet. While the core power and analog input terminals often map directly, be cautious with auxiliary digital inputs/outputs (DIs/DOs), as the YS1700 provides more flexible assignment options.
• Power Supply: Both support AC 100 V and DC drive. In both the YS170 and YS1700, the DC supply can be connected without regard to polarity (polarity-free DC input), which helps reduce wiring error risk during a rush replacement job.

4.2. Programming and Firmware Update Methodology

The most significant change for maintenance personnel is the programming environment.

• YS170 (Legacy): Primarily utilized a concise text-based programming language, often requiring specialized EPROM reading/writing equipment (like a Batronix BX32) to read the program from an old SLPC or YS170 if the NVRAM was corrupted.
• YS1700 (Modern): Uses the dedicated YSS1000 Setting Software for YS1000 Series. This software allows for modern Function Block Diagram (FBD) programming in addition to the legacy text-based approach for backwards compatibility.
• Crucial Step: When replacing a YS170, the user program and parameters must be converted using the YSS1000 software. This tool is specifically designed to read the old YS170 program and convert it to the YS1700 format, ensuring a smooth transition of the control logic. Engineers must factor in the time for this program conversion and testing.
• Firmware Updates: The YS1700 supports modern connectivity options (USB, Ethernet/RS485 with option), making firmware and program updates significantly easier than on the older, more isolated YS170 hardware.

---

5. Programming Conversion Strategies for Control Continuity

The seamless transition of the control logic from the legacy YS170 to the YS1700 is the most critical hurdle in a replacement scenario. Merely replacing the hardware without ensuring the identical control function can lead to process instability.

5.1. Utilizing the YSS1000 Software for Direct Program Migration

Field experience dictates that the most reliable method for migration is using the proprietary YSS1000 configuration software.

Decision Flowchart for YS170 Replacement:

• Scenario A (Best Case): Original YS170 program and parameter files are backed up on a local drive.
• Action: Upload files into YSS1000. Use the built-in conversion feature. Download the converted program to the new YS1700. This is the fastest and most secure route.
• Scenario B (Common Field Case): Original YS170 program resides only on the controller's NVRAM.
• Action: Connect a communication interface (USB/RS485) to the YS170 (if possible) or physically read the memory chip. Use YSS1000 to read and convert the program. Download to YS1700. This path requires specialized communication expertise or hardware.
• Scenario C (Worst Case): YS170 failed and no program backup exists.
• Action: The user program must be re-engineered from scratch on the YS1700 using the Function Block programming. This is time-consuming but offers the opportunity to optimize the control loop with the YS1700's advanced features.

Experience-Based Condition: If the original YS170 utilized independent two-loop control, engineers should verify the function block sequence on the YS1700 carefully. Sometimes, the order of execution in the new environment can inadvertently simplify the control to a single loop, necessitating a manual correction to the function block logic.

---

6. Advanced Functions and Control Superiority of the YS1700

While the YS1700 is a direct replacement, it functions as a comprehensive upgrade platform. Technical personnel should leverage these new features to enhance the overall process stability and resilience.

6.1. Enhanced Controller Reliability Features

The YS1700 features several high-reliability components not present in the YS170:

• Hard Manual Mode: This independent manual override capability is built directly into the control circuits, ensuring that even if the CPU fails completely, the operator can still take control of the output via the front panel keys. This is a critical factor when assessing the risk profile of the equipment, providing a clear advantage over the YS170 in terms of process fail-safe capability.
• Self-Tuning (STC) Function: This feature simplifies the often-complex task of PID loop tuning. Both the legacy YS170 and the YS1700 support an automatic self-tuning (STC) function that can calculate optimal PID parameters during startup or after significant process changes. On the YS1700, the STC function is integrated into the new control add-on/STC module and is easier to invoke (for example via front-panel operations or digital input), making it particularly useful for processes with slow or unpredictable dynamics.

6.2. Communication and Networking Capabilities

The YS1700 facilitates better integration into modern control architectures:

• Peer-to-Peer Communication: The YS1700 supports a dedicated peer-to-peer communication function, allowing up to 32 units to exchange data (4 analog and 16 status data) within a 200 ms interval. Condition: This feature is superior when building small, highly distributed control clusters, such as coordinating multiple furnace temperature zones, where the YS170 would have required a separate PLC or DCS system to manage the inter-controller communication.
• Ethernet Connectivity: The availability of an optional Ethernet port on the YS1700 allows for direct IP-based access for monitoring, programming, and remote diagnostics, moving far beyond the older serial-only connectivity of the YS170.

---

7. Experience-Driven Selection Criteria: When to Choose YS1700

The decision to replace a YS170 is rarely difficult due to obsolescence, but the choice of replacement model and the strategy employed can vary based on field conditions.

7.1. Decision Based on Operational Complexity

• If the YS170 was only running basic single-loop control (e.g., simple flow control) and no external computation was used: The YS1700 can be used in its Function Selection Mode. This is a configuration-only mode that requires no programming, making the replacement nearly plug-and-play after parameter mapping. This is the most cost-effective and fastest path.
• If the YS170 utilized advanced programming logic and required external computation/bias units: The YS1700 is superior due to its ability to consolidate all this logic into one box using Function Block Programming. Engineers should choose the YS1700 when system simplification and reliability are the primary goals, as it eliminates failure points associated with external hardware.

7.2. Long-Term Value in Performance Metrics

Experienced engineers often look beyond immediate replacement to the long-term system health. The YS1700’s vast improvement in internal computation resolution (from 1/4096 to 1/65536) translates to a significant reduction in quantization error. Condition: This difference is most noticeable in slow-acting, high-inertia processes (like large tanks or heat exchangers) where the minute inaccuracies of the YS170’s control algorithm could compound over time, leading to unnecessary hunting or long settling times. The YS1700 is demonstrably more capable of maintaining a stable setpoint under these challenging conditions.

---

8. Final Migration Checklist for Seamless Continuity

The move from the YS170 to the YS1700 is an evolution, not just a repair. Following a structured checklist minimizes errors in high-pressure replacement situations.

8.1. Pre-Installation Audit

• Identify Power Supply: Confirm the exact AC or DC power option on the legacy YS170 and order the YS1700 with the correct configuration (especially if 220 V AC is required).
• Verify Panel Depth: Ensure the panel space can accommodate the 250 mm depth of the YS1700 basic type, although the form factor is designed for backwards compatibility.
• Secure Program Backup: Ensure the YS170’s program and parameters have been successfully read, either from memory or from a backup file, for use with the YSS1000 conversion tool.

8.2. Post-Installation Commissioning

• I/O Calibration: Utilize the YS1700’s easier calibration process, which can store calibration records internally. This provides traceable documentation that was cumbersome to maintain on the older hardware.
• Function Block Debugging: Use the YSS1000's online module monitoring function to confirm the control logic is executing correctly on the YS1700, especially the flow and order of function blocks.
• Hard Manual Test: Test the "Hard Manual" override function to confirm the fail-safe capability is operational, ensuring process control can be maintained even during an internal failure event.

The upgrade to the YOKOGAWA YS1700 is a necessary step for maintaining operational excellence and system resilience in the face of equipment obsolescence. By understanding the functional and physical compatibility points, and critically, by utilizing the dedicated programming conversion tools, process owners can ensure a secure and high-performance transition.

---

Note to Readers: The technical information in this guide is provided for educational and comparison purposes only and should not replace official manufacturer documentation. Always consult YOKOGAWA's official manuals and specifications before undertaking any replacement or system upgrade procedure.

The author assumes no liability for any loss, damage, or malfunction resulting from the use or application of this information. Use is strictly at the reader's own risk.